
Degrii
Degrii Zima Lite
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- Not scored
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- $699list

Degrii

MOVA
Up to three
All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Degrii Zima Lite | MOVA Diver A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Pool type | ||
| In-groundthey differ | DependsMaximum obstacle clearance is 3.9 in; in-ground drains, ladders or fittings taller than that can stop it. | GoodEFTM and Digital Reviews Network both tested in-ground pools, including a saltwater pebblecrete pool, with strong results. |
| Above-groundthey differ | GoodNo above-ground-specific validation was found; the same 3.9 in obstacle-clearance limit that concerns in-ground drains applies here too. | DependsMOVA lists vinyl pools as supported, but neither test covered an above-ground pool or its shallower depth. |
| Mixed setupthey differ | GoodDual-radar 3D path planning for floor, wall and waterline coverage is not restricted to either installation type in the specs. | DependsA mixed setup needs both pool types confirmed, and above-ground use has not been independently tested. |
| Pool size | ||
| Small (< 400 sqft) | GoodEven the more conservative 1,614 sq ft manufacturer figure is well beyond what a small pool needs to clean each cycle. | GoodEFTM judged its floor clean could have finished in about 90 minutes of a longer battery cycle. |
| Medium (400 – 800) | GoodA medium pool sits safely under both the 1,614 sq ft EU figure and the 3,800 sq ft US figure Degrii publishes. | GoodDigital Reviews Network cleaned most of a 110 m² pool on one charge of up to 210 minutes. |
| Large (> 800) | DependsDegrii's own EU and US listings disagree on maximum coverage (1,614 vs 3,800 sq ft); confirm against the larger pool before buying. | DependsMOVA rates 1,900 sq ft in floor mode, and a 110 m² pool already used most of a charge. |
| Debris load | ||
| Fine (sand / silt) | GoodBoth filter baskets are rated at 180 microns, with no finer mesh option documented for capturing very fine silt. | GoodEFTM found its filter traps fine particles, and a 3 micron ultra-fine filter is available. |
| Leaves / large debris | GoodDual 180-micron filters with 6.5 L combined capacity are sized for leaf and larger debris loads. | GoodDigital Reviews Network's basket collected leaves, small sticks and dog hair in a 3.5 L capacity. |
| Algae / heavy fouling | DependsNo independent test of cleaning performance against algae was located; available coverage largely restates manufacturer specifications. | DependsDual waterline scrubbing reduced a waterline mark, but no test checked algae on floors or walls. |
| Coverage you want | ||
| Floor only | GoodFloor mode is one of five selectable modes, running independently of the wall and waterline passes. | GoodDigital Reviews Network rated floor cleaning very good, and EFTM called its pool spotless. |
| Floor + walls | GoodA dedicated Wall mode cleans walls separately from Floor mode, among the five selectable cleaning modes. | GoodEFTM saw it climb every wall, and Digital Reviews Network found wall cleaning impressive. |
| Floor + walls + waterline | GoodOverall mode covers floor, walls and waterline together in one cycle, driven by the dual-radar 3D path planning. | GoodDigital Reviews Network saw it remove much of a waterline mark, and EFTM saw the waterline scrubbed clean. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Charge time, Noise, Height.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Dual-ultrasonic-radar 3D path planning across floor, walls and waterline is a real capability by manufacturer design, but Degrii’s own regional listings disagree on how large a pool that planning actually covers, and this research could not reconcile the two figures.
Auto-parking at the nearest wall reduces how far a robot has to be fished from open water, but it still requires manual lifting rather than a full self-exit, so the retrieval task is reduced, not eliminated.
Cordless operation keeps cables off the deck, but it needs retrieving and about five hours of charging between runs.
EFTM saw it climb walls and steps, while Digital Reviews Network still had to tidy steps, corners and a beach entry.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Degrii Zima Lite | Pending | 5 | Aug 2026 |
| MOVA Diver A10 | Verified | 7 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordDegrii Zima LiteSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordMOVA Diver A10Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.